ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Implementation of large language models in electronic health records.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Multimodal Vision-Language Models Enhance the Medical Diagnostic Process? A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Leveraging computerized adaptive testing for cost-effective evaluation of large language models in medical benchmarking.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- When Agentic LLMs Trust Poisoned Tools: Vulnerability of Clinical LLMs to Adversarial Guidelines.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have improved access to patient information but substantially increased clinicians' documentation workload. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a potential means to reduce this burden, yet real-world deployments in live hospital systems remain limited. We implemented a secure, GDPR-compliant, on-premises LLM assistant integrated into the Epic EHR at a European university hospital. The system uses Qwen3-235B with Retrieval Augmented Generation to deliver context-aware answers drawing on structured patient data, internal and regional clinical documents, and medical literature. A one-month pilot with 28 physicians across nine specialties demonstrated high engagement, with 64% of participants using the assistant daily and generating 482 multi-turn conversations. The most common tasks were summarization, information retrieval, and note drafting, which together accounted for over 70% of interactions. Following the pilot, the system was deployed hospital-wide and adopted by 1,028 users who generated 14,910 conversations over five months, with more than half of clinicians using it at least weekly. Usage remained concentrated on information access and documentation support, indicating stable incorporation into everyday clinical workflows. Feedback volume decreased compared with the pilot, suggesting that routine use diminishes voluntary reporting and underscoring the need for complementary automated monitoring strategies. These findings demonstrate that large-scale integration of LLMs into clinical environments is technically feasible and can achieve sustained use when embedded directly within EHR workflows and governed by strong privacy safeguards. The observed patterns of engagement show that such systems can deliver consistent value in information retrieval and documentation, providing a replicable model for responsible clinical AI deployment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.