ArticlePloS one2025
Effects of intention understanding and brief imitative experience on the mirror neuron system: An EEG study using Japanese sign language.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mirror neuron system (MNS) is the neural system that activates when individuals both observe and execute an action. Previous studies consistently indicate that the MNS is also involved in intention understanding. In addition, MNS activity is augmented after imitating an unfamiliar action. However, it remains unclear whether conscious effort to interpret an actors' intention further activates the MNS, consequently promoting action learning. To investigate an interactive effect between intention understanding and imitative experience of unfamiliar actions, the present study measured EEG while participants observed Japanese sign language and while they imitated signing. To manipulate a level of intention understanding, we prepared two tasks: the counting task required participants to count the number of body movements in sign language, and the meaning task required participants to guess the meaning of sign language. Mu suppression, one of the indices of the MNS, was measured during three phases: pre-imitation, imitation, and post-imitation. The results revealed that the magnitude of mu suppression was comparable between the two tasks, and remained unchanged in the pre- and post-imitation phases. The null effect of the imitative experience may be attributable to cultural factors as gestural communication is less encouraged in Japanese culture, making it challenging for the MNS to learn new actions. Furthermore, absence of an effect from the task may be attributed to greater number of unfamiliar movements in sign language, resulting in the MNS preferentially processing body movements rather than the intention of actors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.