ArticlePloS one2025
Determinants of farmers' decision-making behavior for black soil protection in Northeast China-A case of Jilin Province.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Northeast black soil area is one of the world's four major pieces of black soil area, which has a pivotal position in ensuring national food security. But in recent years it degraded, it is urgent to protect it. Farmers are the main body directly involved in black soil protection, and farmers' response, that is, perceived status, directly reflects their recognition, acceptance and active cooperation with black soil protection, which is an important factor affecting their willingness to protect black soil. Therefore, based on the survey data of 486 farmers in black soil area of Jilin Province, this study studied farmers' intention choice and behavior response based on the theory of planned behavior.The empirical results showed that the farmers' black soil protection behavior followed the logic of Farmer's Cognition-Behavioral Intention-Behavioral and farmers' protection behavior response is determined by their behavior intention, behavior attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Specifically, in the Perceived Behavioral Control→Behavioral Intention→Behavior path, there were both significant direct and indirect effects between variables, while in the Attitude toward Behavior→Behavioral Intention→Behavior path there were only significant indirect effects. There are significant correlations among farmers' behavioral attitudes, subjective norms, and perceptual behavioral control. In order to protect the black soil successfully, the farmers' willingness and income should be paid enough attention to and the central and local governments should publicize and train rural carders, farmers and other stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.