Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417807›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

FLUid management and InDividualized resuscitation in Sepsis (FLUIDS)-A Study protocol for a single-centre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Sanne Ter Horst, Ewoud Ter Avest, Jildou van Everdink, Matijs van Meurs, Tycho J Olgers, Jaap Jan Vos, Kevin Damman, Jan C Ter Maaten, Hjalmar R Bouma

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07009665 (Fluid Management and Individualized Resuscitation in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07009665 narecruitingnot on this map

Fluid Management and Individualized Resuscitation in Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled188ConditionsSepsis, Shock, Personalized Medicine, Emergency MedicineArmsPersonalized SV-guided resuscitation, Standard Care Resuscitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sanne Ter HorstDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2919
Ewoud Ter AvestDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jildou van EverdinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0477-8984
Matijs van MeursDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tycho J OlgersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5119-5245
Jaap Jan VosDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kevin DammanDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-2228
Jan C Ter MaatenDepartment of Acute Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar R BoumaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly septic shock results from complex hemodynamic disturbances, including vasodilation, capillary leakage, and hypovolemia, requiring timely resuscitation to prevent organ failure. Initial fluid administration in the emergency department (ED) varies widely, influenced by clinician experience, patient comorbidities, and infection source. Fluid therapy is frequently not tailored to individual patient responsiveness and tolerance, highlighting the importance of personalized resuscitation strategies.

objectiveThis study evaluates the effectiveness of a personalized hemodynamic resuscitation strategy during the initial management of sepsis in the ED, using continuous non-invasive stroke volume index (SVI) measurements to guide intravenous (IV) fluid therapy and early vasopressor initiation.

methodThis single-centre, open-label, randomized clinical trial at the Emergency Department of the University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands, will enroll 188 adults with suspected sepsis requiring hemodynamic resuscitation, defined by a mean arterial pressure (MAP) <70 mmHg, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg, shock index >0.9, or lactate concentration >4.0 mmol/L. Deferred consent will be obtained within 30 days of ED presentation. Patients will be randomized to the intervention group, in which fluids and vasopressors will be guided by changes in SVI (ΔSVI) after IV fluid administration, or to the control group, where fluids and vasopressors will be administered at the discretion of the treating physician during the initial 3-hour resuscitation phase. The primary endpoint is the volume of IV fluids administered within the first three hours after enrollment. Secondary endpoints include cumulative fluid balance, timing and dose of vasopressors, incidence of organ failure, hospital length of stay, mortality and fluid-related adverse events, including venous congestion assessed by point-of-care ultrasound. EXPECTED

resultsWe anticipate that SVI-guided resuscitation will reduce IV fluid volume compared to standard care. This personalized approach, tailoring fluid and vasopressor administration to the individual's hemodynamic needs, has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with sepsis.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07009665.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyResuscitationSepsisAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID41417807
PMCPMC12716701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.