ArticlePloS one2025
Leading predictors and their associations with combination opioid pain therapy in older adults with cancer: Application of machine learning approaches.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combined use of opioids and other pharmacological therapies used for pain management, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, and/or skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs), in older adult cancer survivors can increase the risk of mortality. The objective of this study was to identify the leading predictors of opioid combination therapy with other therapies that may be inappropriate in older adults with cancer using interpretable machine learning approaches. A retrospective cohort design of older (> 66 years at diagnosis) cancer survivors (N = 2,682) diagnosed with primary and incident cancer in 2014. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked with Medicare claims database was used. Recursive feature elimination with random forest was used to extract the optimal number of features out of 119 for predictive modeling. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and global feature importance were used to identify the leading predictors and their associations with opioid combination therapy. Overall, 37.4% of older adults with cancer used opioid combination therapy. We included 34 features in the final predictive model.The predictive model had a good high area under the curve (AUC, 0. 758) and high recall (0.821) with the test dataset. We included 34 features in the final predictive model. Baseline opioids, NSAIDs, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, chemotherapy, surgery, and female sex generally positively predicted opioid combination therapy. We observed relationships of zip code percentage residents and Native American residents living below poverty with opioid combination therapy. Patient-level baseline medication use, biological factors, cancer treatment, and zip code-level poverty were leading predictors of opioid combination therapy. Our study findings contribute to the knowledge for targeted interventions to reduce the risk of opioid combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.