ArticlePloS one2025
Prevalence of dry eye symptoms and associated risk factors among students at Al-Mustaqbal University, Iraq.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative clinical outcomes of SMILE, femtosecond LASIK, and transepithelial PRK: a multicenter Iraqi study.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Distribution and factors associated with refractive errors among young adults attending ophthalmic clinics in Iraq: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of dry eye symptoms (DES) among Iraqi university students and to examine associations with digital device use in an arid, dust-prone setting. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at Al-Mustaqbal University (Iraq) between February and May 2025 using paper-based questionnaires that captured demographics, device-use patterns, symptom burden, and self-management behaviors. Symptom severity was assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and DES prevalence was estimated using the Women's Health Study (WHS) questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was applied to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 1,487 invited students, 1,154 completed the survey (response rate 77.6%); participants were aged 19-24 years, and 63.6% were female. The WHS-defined prevalence of symptomatic DES was 62.0%. Blurred vision, burning, and ocular redness were the most frequent symptoms. A dose-response relationship was observed between daily screen time and OSDI severity, with the highest burden among students reporting more than 7 hours per day (trend p < 0.001). In adjusted models, female participants had higher odds (aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.56-3.56; p < 0.001), screen time >7 h/day (aOR 2.25; 95% CI 1.55-3.31; p < 0.001), fourth academic year (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.18-2.60; p = 0.01), and use of glasses/contact lenses (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.10-1.90; p = 0.01) were significant predictors. Laptops were most often associated with ocular redness, smartphones with burning and pain, and tablets with blurred vision. In conclusion, DES symptoms were highly prevalent and strongly associated with prolonged daily screen exposure. Female sex, advanced academic standing, and corrective lens use further increased risk. Findings support campus-level prevention focused on digital hygiene, ergonomic optimization, and periodic ocular screening, considering environmental stressors typical of arid, dust-prone settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.