Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417759›Full record

ReviewPloS one2025

Interprofessional collaboration between hospital-based palliative care teams and hospital ward staff: A realist review.

Louana Moons, Fouke Ombelet, Mieke Deschodt, Maaike L De Roo, Eva Oldenburger, Inge Bossuyt, Peter Pype

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louana MoonsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fouke OmbeletDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mieke DeschodtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1560-2277
Maaike L De RooDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eva OldenburgerDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Inge BossuytDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter PypeUnit Interprofessional Collaboration in Education, Research, and Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo ensure high quality in-hospital palliative care delivery, we need a deeper understanding of the interprofessional collaboration processes between palliative care teams (PCTs) and hospital ward staff. This realist review aims to unravel the relationships between contextual (C) factors, mechanisms (M), and outcomes (O) related to this interprofessional collaboration process.

methodsThis realist review employed an iterative, theory-driven approach which led to the development of a refined program theory explaining how, for whom, and under which conditions interprofessional collaboration between PCTs and hospital ward staff contributes to quality of care. On April 21st, 2023, five electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 2013 and April 2023. Data screening and extraction was carried out by two independent researchers. Data-analysis was a two-phase iterative process to develop an overarching CMO-model and ground this model within third-generation cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT).

resultsWe identified 10 recurrent mechanisms contributing to the process of interprofessional collaboration and several moderating factors influencing ward staff's willingness to initiate PCT involvement. Contextual factors at both ward staff and PCT levels triggered mechanisms related to awareness, feelings, perspectives, and expectations, shaping outcomes for ward staff, PCTs, patients, and relatives. Notable outcomes included improved patient understanding of their disease, relatives' increased satisfaction with care, greater PCT involvement, and a sense of relief among ward staff. The CHAT-analysis revealed the interplay between expectations, roles, and beliefs in shaping interprofessional collaboration. Dual effects of mediating artifacts, such as palliative care training and time constraints, were observed depending on context, further illustrating the complexity of collaborative practices. Ultimately, this realist review emphasized the need for hospital decision-makers to acknowledge the multidimensional aspects of palliative care and foster a sense of partnership between PCTs and ward staff to optimize IPC. A refined program theory was developed to guide future interventions.

conclusionThis realist review highlights the complexity of interprofessional collaboration between PCTs and ward staff, emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches that address specific contextual needs, expectations, and norms. Strengthening positive attitudes, clarifying roles, and fostering partnerships can enhance interprofessional collaboration, ultimately improving palliative care quality in hospital settings.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPalliative CarePatient Care TeamHospitalsHumansQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41417759
PMCPMC12716714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.