Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417732›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

Neural stem cell quiescence is actively maintained by the epigenome.

Anna Malkowska, Jan Ander, Andrea H Brand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna MalkowskaDepartment of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Jan AnderGurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Andrea H BrandDepartment of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK. Electronic address: andrea.brand@nyulangone.org.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092096Wellcome Trust 222276Wellcome Trust 223111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homeostasis of the nervous system is maintained by a population of resident neural stem cells (NSCs) retained in a state of reversible cell-cycle arrest called quiescence. Quiescent NSCs can resume proliferation in response to different physiological stimuli. Reactivation requires changes in gene expression, much of which is regulated at the epigenomic level. We mapped epigenomic changes in NSC chromatin during stem cell quiescence and reactivation in Drosophila in vivo. Contrary to expectations, chromatin accessibility is increased in quiescent NSCs. Surprisingly, genes crucial for cell-cycle progression are repressed while remaining within permissive H3K36me3-bound euchromatin. At the same time, genes necessary for cell-cell communication are derepressed by eviction of histone H1 and transition to an SWI/SNF-enriched active state. Our results reveal global expansion of accessible chromatin in quiescent NSCs without concomitant transcriptional activation. Strikingly, this process reverses upon reactivation, indicating that opening of chromatin is a quiescence-specific event.

Indexed as

EpigenomeNeural Stem CellsAnimalsCell CycleCell ProliferationChromatinDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHistonesChromatinDrosophila ProteinsHistoneschromatinCP: molecular biologyCP: stem cell researchhistone modificationquiescencestem cellTargeted DamID

Identifiers

PMID41417732
PMCPMC7618819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.