Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417531›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2025

Validity, reproducibility, and reliability of the Brazilian version of the smartphone addiction scale-short version in children.

Rafael Vieira Martins, Eliane Denise Araújo Bacil, Michael Pereira da Silva, Wagner de Campos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafael Vieira MartinsUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-6248
Eliane Denise Araújo BacilUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-395X
Michael Pereira da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7628-3997
Wagner de CamposUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3979-1017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the validity, reproducibility, and reliability of the Brazilian version of the smartphone addiction scale in children.

methodsThe sample included 194 children (105 girls), aged 8-10 years, enrolled in the public school system of the city of Curitiba (PR). A self-reported questionnaire assessed sociodemographic data (sex, age, type of housing, type of residence, number of siblings, and father's and mother's education). The ABEP (Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa) questionnaire assessed economic class, and the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version assessed problematic smartphone use (PSU). Factor analysis was performed to analyze the validity of the PSU scale; the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reproducibility of the instrument; and reliability was measured by internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha (α). All analyses were performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21.0 software, adopting a significance level of p<0.05.

resultsFactor analysis resulted in three factors that explained 50.2% of the total variance. The ICC ranged from 0.34 to 0.81, with a value of 0.85 as the overall score. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.35 to 0.81, with an overall score of 0.87.

conclusionsThe scale showed adequate factorial validity and acceptable consistency and reproducibility. The use of this scale is recommended in studies conducted with children aged 8-10 years.

Indexed as

Internet Addiction DisorderSmartphoneBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41417531
PMCPMC12704934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.