Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417527›Full record

Observational studyRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2025

Children's soap pH analysis and its meaning in children's skin cleansing.

Rafaela Moura de Oliveira, Maria Carolina Schneider, Izabella Rodrigues Reis Gomes, Larissa Habib Mendonça Gois, Mariana Aparecida Pasa Morgan, Kerstin Taniguchi Abagge

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafaela Moura de OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Postgraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-1110
Maria Carolina SchneiderUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1739-9858
Izabella Rodrigues Reis GomesUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Postgraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-5051
Larissa Habib Mendonça GoisUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Dermatology Division, Curitiba PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5430-2309
Mariana Aparecida Pasa MorganFaculdade Ceres, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-3540
Kerstin Taniguchi AbaggeUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Dermatology Division, Curitiba PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-2459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the surface hydrogen potential (pH) values of children's soaps to identify those with a pH closer to the physiological one (5.0-5.5) and describe the most prevalent surfactants in the sample.

methodsThis was a observational, analytical, cross-sectional, and quantitative study that included 96 cleansing products intended for children's or sensitive skin, available at over-the-counter sales points in a Brazilian capital. The pH of the samples was measured after dilution to 1% in distilled water. A total of 34 bar soaps and 62 liquid soaps (including 20 syndets) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and Student's t-test were used to analyze the differences between the groups, with a minimum significance level of 5%. The surfactants present in the products were listed, and the most prevalent were identified.

resultsThe pH of the products ranged from 4.54 to 11.01, with a mean of 7.80±1.90. The pH levels differed between the liquid and bar formulations (4.54-8.00 vs. 8.01-11.01, respectively; p<0.001). The syndets had pH values closer to the physiological range (4.99-7.78), with lower values when compared to liquid soaps (p<0.001). The most prevalent surfactant in the sample was cocamidopropyl betaine.

conclusionsBar soaps do not have a pH suitable for children's skin cleansing, whereas liquid soaps, particularly syndets, have a pH closer to the physiological range. Knowledge of the pH values of children's cleansing products by health professionals and caregivers is important, given the wide variety found in this study and the lack of reliable information on the packaging of most products.

Indexed as

Skin CareSoapsSurface-Active AgentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSoapsSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID41417527
PMCPMC12704940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.