ArticleAdvances in dental research2026
Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Intersectionality in Oral Health Care.
Article in Advances in dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oral Health-related Quality of Life Among 2SLGBTQIAPN+: A Systematic Review.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses an intersectional framework to examine how race, gender, and sexual orientation jointly influence access to dental care in the United States. Leveraging cross-sectional data from the All of Us Research Program, we applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy to assess disparities in dental service use and affordability across 30 intersectional strata. Results showed substantial inequities, with racialized, gender-diverse, and sexual minority individuals facing greater barriers to care. While most disparities were explained by additive effects, the findings highlight the importance of intersectionality in revealing how layered disadvantage shapes oral health outcomes. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of oral health equity by integrating gender and sexual orientation into intersectional health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.