ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Identification of NK cell marker genes based on single-cell sequencing to establish a prognostic signature in breast cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor-infiltrating natural killer (NK) cells are pivotal in modulating tumor progression, either by promoting or inhibiting neoplastic development. Nevertheless, the implications of NK cells in breast carcinoma remain inadequately understood. This investigation aimed to delineate the impact of NK cells on both the prognosis and the immune infiltration landscape in breast cancer.
methodsNK cell marker genes were identified using single-cell sequencing data from breast cancer available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. A prognostic model was constructed based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and subsequently validated with the GEO dataset. Disparities in immune cell infiltration between low-risk and high-risk cohorts, as stratified by the prognostic model, were examined. Additionally, genes differentially expressed between these cohorts were subjected to enrichment analysis.
resultsA total of 29 NK cell marker genes were identified through single-cell sequencing, and a prognostic model was subsequently developed using machine learning techniques based on the TCGA data. This model demonstrated robust predictive performance when applied to both TCGA and GEO datasets. Notably, a significant difference in immune infiltration was observed between the low-risk and high-risk groups. The findings were further validated through enrichment analysis.
conclusionsIn summary, we constructed a prognostic signature characterized by strong predictive performance, which has elucidated the critical role of NK cells in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Furthermore, this model offers a predictive index and identifies a novel therapeutic target for the advancement of immunotherapeutic strategies in the clinical management of breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.