Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417398›Full record

ArticleCritical care science2025

Protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of spontaneous breathing trial in children with and without pressure support.

José Colleti Junior, Orlei Ribeiro de Araujo, Karina Tavares Weber, Gabriela Maria Virgílio Dias Santos, Dafne Cardoso Bourguignon da Silva, Leila Costa Volpon, Ana Paula de Carvalho Panzeri Carlotti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06593288 (Randomized Clinical Trial of Spontaneous Breathing Test), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06593288 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial of Spontaneous Breathing Test

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2025 to 2026Enrolled170ConditionsMechanical Ventilation, Spontaneous Breathing Trial, Extubation Readiness, Extubation FailuresArmsPressure Support Ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José Colleti JuniorDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-5765
Orlei Ribeiro de AraujoGrupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer, Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8230-6801
Karina Tavares WeberDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2626-2394
Gabriela Maria Virgílio Dias SantosGrupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer, Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-7022
Dafne Cardoso Bourguignon da SilvaGrupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer, Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-0495
Leila Costa VolponDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-3760
Ana Paula de Carvalho Panzeri CarlottiDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2760-8801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether continuous positive airway pressure during spontaneous breathing trial is non-inferior to pressure support by comparing both techniques in mechanically ventilated children.

methodsThis is a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome is successful liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours post-extubation. Secondary outcomes include the need for post-extubation respiratory support and the length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit. The sample size is estimated to be 170 participants. Non-inferiority will be assessed using the Farrington-Manning test. The trial registration number is NCT06593288 (clinicaltrials.gov). Infants older than 36 weeks corrected gestational age and < 18 years old admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and ready to wean will be included. Patients with chronic pulmonary conditions, congenital heart disease, upper airway abnormalities, morbid obesity, and in palliative care will be excluded. Patients who have passed the extubation readiness test will be randomized to receive either continuous positive airway pressure or pressure support during a spontaneous breathing trial.

resultsthe results of the study should be ready and published within a year.

conclusionThe transition from mechanical ventilation to spontaneous breathing is a pivotal moment in the care of critically ill children. Yet, limited high-quality evidence informs the optimal approach to spontaneous breathing trials. Our protocol outlines a rigorously designed non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing spontaneous breathing trials conducted with and without pressure support.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureRespiration, ArtificialVentilator WeaningAdolescentAirway ExtubationChildChild, PreschoolEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricLength of StayMaleMulticenter Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41417398
PMCPMC12674819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.