Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417381›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025

Nurses' contributions to reproductive rights in family planning: a qualitative study.

Joselaine Rigue, Leandro da Silva de Medeiros, Claudia Zamberlan, Márcia Noélia Pestana Santos, Dirce Stein Backes, Naiana Oliveira Dos Santos, Cristina Saling Kruel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joselaine RigueUniversidade Franciscana. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-1064-0968
Leandro da Silva de MedeirosUniversidade Franciscana. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7886-463X
Claudia ZamberlanUniversidade Franciscana. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1898-328X
Márcia Noélia Pestana SantosEscola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra. Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-0291
Dirce Stein BackesUniversidade Franciscana. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9447-1126
Naiana Oliveira Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-2607
Cristina Saling KruelUniversidade Franciscana. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1996-7708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how primary care nurses understand and integrate reproductive rights in the context of family planning.

methodAction research developed between September and November 2023 with five nurses from a Primary Care Health Unit in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul. Data were collected through focus groups and analyzed using the content analysis technique.

resultsNurses highlighted reproductive autonomy, with an increase in the demand for tubal ligations; personalized education on contraception; the socioeconomic impact on access to family planning; and challenges related to male inclusion, with strategies aimed at co-responsibility in planning. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: Nurses play an essential role in promoting reproductive rights. By respecting individualities and the social context, nurses promote shared responsibility and strengthen female autonomy, which are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals that aim at gender equality and reducing inequalities.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesNursesNurse's RoleReproductive RightsAdultBrazilFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41417381
PMCPMC12707846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.