Trial reportRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Clinical simulation and deliberate practice in rapid-cycle deliberate practice: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto compare clinical simulation with a standardized patient with rapid-cycle deliberate practice in knowledge acquisition, perception of experience and scenario design in the care of patients with suspected stroke.
methodsa randomized clinical trial conducted between 2022 and 2023 involving 134 undergraduate nursing students. After a theoretical class, participants were randomly assigned to one group. A questionnaire was administered before and after the practical sessions to assess knowledge, in addition to the Educational Practices Questionnaire and the Simulation Design Scale.
resultsthe groups showed significant improvement in knowledge (p<0.001), with no difference between them (p=1.0). Rapid-cycle deliberate practice obtained a better assessment regarding design (p=0.03).
conclusionsthe strategies are effective and recommended in nursing education, although rapid-cycle deliberate practice showed advantages in student engagement. Universal Trial Number: U1111-1295-1246.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.