ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Development and validation of a questionnaire on nursing care for people with radiodermatitis.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto develop and validate a questionnaire on clinical practices developed by radiotherapy nurses in the process of caring for people at risk of or with radiodermatitis.
methodsmethodological study, containing: establishment of the conceptual framework; definition of objectives and target population; development of items and responses; selection and organization of items; structuring of the questionnaire; content validation using the Content Validity Index; pre-testing in the target population. Data collection was performed via the Research Electronic Data Capture platform.
resultsin the content validation, the questionnaire was expanded to a total of 55 questions. The overall Content Validity Index value for relevance was 0.97 and 1.00 for representativeness. The final version was considered relevant, representative, and had an appropriate layout. The target population considered the items to be relevant and clear.
conclusionsthe validated questionnaire will contribute to the standardization of nursing care for people with radiodermatitis, considering current resolutions and evidence, through the application of evidence-based protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.