ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Cross-cultural adaptation of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit 24R - Brazilian version.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto cross-culturally adapt and validate the content of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit 24R for use in Brazil.
methodsmethodological research. Translation, translation consensus, equivalence assessment, back-translation, back-translation consensus, and pre-test were performed. Seven experts assessed translation equivalence and content validity. Applicability, item comprehension, and internal consistency were verified in a pre-test with 30 family members. Data were analyzed using the Content Validity Index, semantic assessment, correlation (r) between items, and Cronbach's alpha.
resultslinguistic adjustments were made to make the items understandable. The Content Validity Index was 0.86, Cronbach's alpha was 0.93, and all items presented a correlation ≥0.30. Semantic assessment obtained more than 85% approval.
conclusionsthe adapted questionnaire had its content validated, proving to be reliable for assessing psychometric properties. It showed potential to contribute to assessing family satisfaction in intensive care in Brazil, in order to identify aspects that need to be improved as well as those that should be maintained and strengthened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.