ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2025
Development and preliminary tests of a portable volumetric capnograph for outpatient use.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a portable volumetric capnograph for collecting data on ventilatory mechanics during spontaneous breathing for outpatient use.
methodsThe device was developed by integrating the following commercially available sensors: a Hamilton® flow sensor (variable orifice; Hamilton Medical AG, Graubünden, Switzerland); an SDP810-125PA differential pressure sensor (Sensirion AG, Stäfa, Switzerland); and a Capnostat 5 CO2 sensor (Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA, USA). An Arduino UNO-R3® microcontroller (Arduino, Monza, Italy) was used as an interface between the sensors and a laptop computer, and a Python application was used to acquire data at 10 ms intervals (100 Hz). Validation included static tests (flow: 0-45 L/min; partial pressure of CO2: 0-100 mmHg) and tests with five healthy volunteers (n = 115 respiratory cycles), in comparison with the reference equipment (a CO2SMO Plus® DX-8100 oxycapnograph; Philips Respironics).
resultsThe static tests showed excellent linear correlation for flow and CO2 concentration. For the tests conducted with the five volunteers, no significant differences were observed between the portable volumetric capnograph and the reference equipment for any of the variables analyzed. Intracycle variability was observed in the capnography curves, reflecting the physiological characteristics of spontaneous breathing.
conclusionsOur portable volumetric capnograph demonstrated the ability to collect accurate data on flow and partial pressure of CO2 during spontaneous breathing, with performance equivalent to that of the reference equipment. The variability in the capnography curves represents an intrinsic characteristic of spontaneous breathing that must be considered when developing algorithms for calculating physiological indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.