ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2025
Tumor budding in gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic value and association with clinicopathological markers.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their association with clinical and pathological factors in gastric cancer.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe analysis of tumor budding (TB) and its prognostic value in gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) has been the focus of several studies, with inconsistent results. This parameter is not included in gastric prognostic classifications or standardized pathological reports.
aimsTo evaluate TB in GA and its prognostic significance through survival analysis, in addition to investigating the association between TB and clinicopathological markers that are considered prognostic factors for this type of cancer.
methodsThis retrospective study covers a period of ten years, from January 2008 to December 2017. It included patients who underwent surgery for GA. TB evaluation followed the 2016 consensus guidelines for colorectal cancer, with three grades: Bd1 (0-4 buds), Bd2 (5-9 buds), and Bd3 (10 or more buds). Additionally, a two-grade classification system was employed, distinguishing between low-grade budding (fewer than 10 buds) and high-grade budding (10 or more buds).
resultsTB was classified as low-grade in 69% of the cases and high-grade in 31%. High-grade TB was significantly correlated with perineural invasion (HR [hazard ratio]: 2.98, 95%CI [95% confidence interval] 1.04-8.53, p=0.004), stages III and IV (HR 4.04, 95%CI 1.27-12.83, p=0.01), and mortality (HR 3.65, 95%CI 1.24-10.74, p=0.02). It was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.005, p<0.05).
conclusionsWe have demonstrated that TB prognostic and predictive value in GA is significant, particularly regarding patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.