SynthesisForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Body packer syndrome: a systematic review of case reports and case series.
Synthesis in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body packer syndrome involves the deliberate internal concealment of illicit drug packets for trafficking. Packet rupture or acute drug toxicity can lead to life-threatening complications. Given the variability across reported cases, a systematic review of case-based evidence is essential. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251028368). A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified case reports and series involving radiologically or surgically confirmed body packers. Extracted data included demographics, drug type, imaging modality, toxicology results, complications, treatment strategy, hospital stay, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using Murad's tool. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for analysis. Seventy-six cases were included. Cocaine and heroin were the most trafficked substances. Computed tomography (CT) was the most reliable imaging modality, outperforming plain radiography and ultrasonography in packet detection. Conservative management was successful in asymptomatic individuals, while surgical intervention was needed in cases of rupture or obstruction. Mortality was associated with packet rupture, poor packaging, and delayed diagnosis. Surgical cases had significantly longer hospital stays than conservative ones (p = 0.0025), as did ICU-admitted patients (p = 0.0044). Heroin cases showed longer stays compared to cocaine (p = 0.0102). CT is the most sensitive diagnostic tool in body packer syndrome. Conservative treatment is appropriate in stable patients. Early diagnosis, multidisciplinary coordination, and vigilance for novel concealment trends are critical to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.