Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417183›Full record

ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2025

Precision of patient specific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates osteosynthesis versus classical workflow in management of class III mandibular fracture.

Abdallah Gaber, Hussein Hatem, Mona El, Mohammed Omara

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05444829 (Precision of Patient Specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Classical Work-flow in Management of Class III Mandibular Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444829 naunknown statusnot on this map

Precision of Patient Specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Classical Work-flow in Management of Class III Mandibular Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbdallah Gaber Ali MohamedRan2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsMandibular FracturesArmsspecific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates, classical reduction and internal fixation.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdallah GaberCairo University, Cairo, Egypt. abdallahgaber@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Hussein HatemCairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mona ElCairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammed OmaraCairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral treatment modalities have been reported in the management of mandibular fractures using an alternative computer-guided approach through the utilization of different designs of guiding devices. However, these computer-guided methods do not always guarantee accurate anatomical bone reduction. This study aimed to assess the reduction precision of the computer-guided mandibular fracture and internal fixation using screw holes locating surgical guide, as presented earlier in the orthognathic surgery field in various studies to be applied in the field of mandibular traumatology, comparing it with the conventional approach.

methodsTwenty-six patients with Brown Class III mandibular fracture, defined by a single fracture line involving the body, parasymphysis or symphysis regions, were randomly assigned to two groups for open reduction and internal fixation. The study group underwent reduction and fixation using patient-specific screw-hole locating guide and pre-bent titanium miniplates, whereas the control group received conventional reduction and fixation with intraoperatively adapted titanium miniplates. Virtual reduction of the fractured mandible was performed in all cases of both groups utilizing CT scan and mimics software. Then, the actual postoperative mandibular model was superimposed over the virtually operated mandibular model based on predefined reference points and plans to obtain dental and bony linear measurements. The recorded measures were statistically analysed.

resultsThe actual postoperative mandibular model in the computer-guided group showed minimal deviation from the virtual mandibular model. While the deviation of the actual post operative model in the conventional group from the virtual model was higher, the difference in deviation between the two groups was statistically significant. The mean bony deviation was 0.09 ± 0.29 mm in the computer-guided group, versus 0.70 ± 0.33 mm in the control group p < 0.001. The mean dental deviation was 0.05 ± 0.16 mm in the computer-guided group versus 0.56 ± 0.32 mm in the control group p < 0.001.The mean operative time of the computer-guided group(1.49 ± 0.19)(hours) was significantly shorter than the mean operative time of control group (1.82 ± 0.37)(hours) which is statistically significant p < 0.001.

conclusionsThe use of screw-hole locating guide and pre-bent plates enhanced surgical accuracy and efficiency. It also highlighted how patient-specific design can reduce dependence on surgeon experience and standardized outcomes in complex mandibular fractures.

trial registrationThe study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System Receipt, ID: NCT05444829.

Indexed as

Class IIIComputer-guided surgeryMandibular fracturesOpen reduction and internal fixation

Identifiers

PMID41417183
PMCPMC12722589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.