Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417115›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Technical advances in endoscopic resection : Potential, limits and the necessary interdisciplinary dialogue with surgery].

Sandra Nagl, Johannes Wießner, Katharina Beyer, Helmut Messmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra NaglIII. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland. Sandra.Nagl@uk-augsburg.de.
Johannes WießnerIII. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Katharina BeyerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Helmut MessmannIII. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years, endoscopic resection techniques, particularly within the field of interventional endoscopy, have advanced substantially, leading to a marked shift in the boundaries of minimally invasive therapy away from procedures that were previously managed primarily by surgery. These are accompanied by a significant expansion of the possibilities for minimally invasive interventions, an improvement of the resection results, optimization of the endoscopic access routes and instrument guidance as well as shortening of the learning curve by standardized techniques and assistance systems. Clinically relevant, in particular, are organ-preserving treatment options with oncological safety, which contribute to a reduction in morbidity and mortality, a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and a faster postinterventional convalescence. With careful patient selection these procedures can additionally improve the quality of life and potentially increase the cost-effectiveness in the healthcare system. At the same time there are still important challenges. The sometimes steep learning curve for complex endoscopic resection techniques, the management of procedure-related complications, such as perforations or hemorrhages and the confirmation of oncologically adequate resection margins necessitate profound expertise, structured training programs and a close interdisciplinary cooperation with surgery. This underlines the necessity of a continuous interdisciplinary dialogue. The implementation of interdisciplinary boards, joint training curricula and clearly defined competence profiles represents a central component a high-quality patient care.

Indexed as

EndoscopyInterdisciplinary CommunicationHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresEndoscopic mucosal resectionsGastrointestinal tractNeoplasmsRecurrenceResection rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.