Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025
Effect of sodium hypochlorite and edta lavage on success rates and postoperative pain in direct pulp capping of cariously exposed permanent teeth: a randomised controlled trial : Corresponding author.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05878249 (Role Of Wound Lavage in Direct Pulp Capping Of Permanent Teeth With Carious Exposure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Role Of Wound Lavage in Direct Pulp Capping Of Permanent Teeth With Carious Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the effect of lavage with sterile saline (SS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on success rate and postoperative pain in direct pulp capping of mature permanent teeth.
methodsIn this double-blind trial (NCT05878249), 140 patients with reversible pulpitis in permanent molars due to caries were enrolled. Following complete caries removal, hemostasis was achieved, and the cavities were randomly assigned to four groups for lavage: (European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by:, Duncan HF et al. Int Endod J 52(7):923-34, 2019); SS ( Asgary S et al. J Endod 44(4):529-35, 2018); 2.5% NaOCl ( Cushley S et al. Int Endod J 54(4):556-71, 2021); 12% EDTA, and ( Ricucci D et al. J Endod 49(1):45-54, 2023), 2.5% NaOCl followed by 12% EDTA (NaOCl/EDTA). Biodentine was applied to the exposed pulp, followed by a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner and composite restoration. Clinical and radiographic success was evaluated at 6 and 12 months. Visual Analog Scale was used to record pain for 7 days. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with tooth survival.
resultsThe overall clinical and radiographic success rate at 12 months was 86.9%. Individual success rates among groups were 71.9% (SS), 90.6% (NaOCl), 87.9% (EDTA), and 97.0% (NaOCl/EDTA). NaOCl/EDTA group showed significantly higher success rates than SS group (p < 0.05). NaOCl and NaOCl/EDTA groups showed a significant reduction in pain compared to SS group on days 5-7 (p < 0.05). Pulp survival analysis revealed an overall success rate of 87.9%. Survival rates among the groups were: SS group - 74.3%, NaOCl group - 91.4%, EDTA group - 88.6%, and NaOCl/EDTA group - 97.1%. Log-rank test revealed a significant difference in the survival between the groups (p = 0.020). NaOCl, EDTA, and NaOCl/EDTA provided higher survival probability (meaning fewer failures) compared to the use of SS alone (P > 0.05). The failure risk was 14.3 times higher with SS than with NaOCl/EDTA (HR: 14.3, 95% CI: 1.7-118.6, p = 0.013).
conclusionsThe combined use of NaOCl/EDTA increased the success rates at 12 months. NaOCl and NaOCl/EDTA elicited significantly less postoperative pain than other groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lavage with NaOCl/EDTA increased the success rates of direct pulp capping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.