ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026
[Position paper of the DGIIN-violence against healthcare personnel in emergeny departments and intensive care units].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [YoungDGIIN's position on the current debate about the proposed 'Specialist in Emergency Medicine' curriculum].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveViolence against healthcare workers in emergency departments and intensive care units has increased significantly in recent years, posing a substantial threat to staff safety. In German emergency departments, 97% of staff report verbal violence and 76% report physical violence. The German Society for Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN) presents the first comprehensive position paper on violence prevention and protective measures.
methodsThe position paper was developed by an interprofessional author group of the DGIIN based on current research data, international literature, and clinical practice experience. It analyzes forms, frequency, causes, and consequences of violence in the hospital setting and develops concrete recommendations for action.
resultsViolence manifests as verbal, physical, sexual, and racist assaults, with patient-related violence (type II) being most common. Main causes are intoxication (45%), long waiting times, staff shortages, and existential fears. Consequences include work disability to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD, 15.8%). The position paper defines eight action areas: standard operating procedures (SOPs), leadership responsibility, systematic incident reporting, mandatory training and de-escalation programs with emphasis on verbal and nonverbal communication techniques (active listening, body language), structured psychosocial support (acute care and peer support), staffing, security measures (services, structural modifications, alarm systems, video surveillance), legal protection.
conclusionViolence prevention and staff protection are essential to patient safety. Professional communication competencies are central de-escalation instruments. The DGIIN demands systematic implementation of all measures in hospitals and their integration into financing. A zero-tolerance culture toward violence, combined with preventive, intervening, and follow-up structures, secures workforce capacity and qualified personnel retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.