Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417075›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

LI-RADS-aligned artificial intelligence for liver cancer diagnosis: methods, evidence, and clinical readiness.

Qamar Abuhassan, Ghaleb Oriquat, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Jaya Bhanu Kanwar, V Ramesh Kumar, Vipasha Sharma, Ashish Singh Chauhan, Temurbek Abdullaev

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qamar AbuhassanDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan.
Ghaleb OriquatFaculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan. goreqat@ammanu.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-628X
Subbulakshmi GanesanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jaya Bhanu KanwarDepartment of Endocrinology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.
V Ramesh KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vipasha SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali,, Punjab,, India.
Ashish Singh ChauhanUttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Temurbek AbdullaevDepartment of Oral Surgery and Dental Implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver tumor diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, and the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) provides a structured framework for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and related entities in at-risk populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly expanded across CT, MRI, and ultrasound/CEUS, yet its clinical credibility depends on adherence to modality-appropriate tasks, robust validation, and alignment with LI-RADS semantics. This narrative review synthesizes methodological patterns, diagnostic performance, and readiness for clinical translation of AI systems designed for liver tumor characterization across major imaging modalities. We examine modality-task alignment-including CT-based differential diagnosis of HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastases, and benign mimics; LI-RADS feature detection and category assignment on MRI; LR-M disambiguation on MRI and CEUS; and surveillance-era triage on ultrasound. Evidence quality is appraised through external validation, reader studies, robustness analyses, calibration, and uncertainty reporting. A minimal reporting checklist is provided to support methodological transparency and facilitate reproducibility. Across modalities, AI systems show strong potential to enhance liver tumor diagnosis when they mirror radiologist reasoning, explicitly handle temporal enhancement dynamics, and incorporate clinically relevant priors. Translation into practice will require protocol-aware robustness, calibrated confidence estimates, size-stratified performance reporting, and broader multi-center validation. When developed under these principles, LI-RADS-aligned AI may meaningfully improve consistency, interpretability, and scalability in imaging-based liver cancer care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsRadiology Information SystemsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceLiver neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.