ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
LI-RADS-aligned artificial intelligence for liver cancer diagnosis: methods, evidence, and clinical readiness.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver tumor diagnosis relies heavily on imaging, and the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) provides a structured framework for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and related entities in at-risk populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly expanded across CT, MRI, and ultrasound/CEUS, yet its clinical credibility depends on adherence to modality-appropriate tasks, robust validation, and alignment with LI-RADS semantics. This narrative review synthesizes methodological patterns, diagnostic performance, and readiness for clinical translation of AI systems designed for liver tumor characterization across major imaging modalities. We examine modality-task alignment-including CT-based differential diagnosis of HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastases, and benign mimics; LI-RADS feature detection and category assignment on MRI; LR-M disambiguation on MRI and CEUS; and surveillance-era triage on ultrasound. Evidence quality is appraised through external validation, reader studies, robustness analyses, calibration, and uncertainty reporting. A minimal reporting checklist is provided to support methodological transparency and facilitate reproducibility. Across modalities, AI systems show strong potential to enhance liver tumor diagnosis when they mirror radiologist reasoning, explicitly handle temporal enhancement dynamics, and incorporate clinically relevant priors. Translation into practice will require protocol-aware robustness, calibrated confidence estimates, size-stratified performance reporting, and broader multi-center validation. When developed under these principles, LI-RADS-aligned AI may meaningfully improve consistency, interpretability, and scalability in imaging-based liver cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.