ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
The association between motor unit behavior and joint power at early and late phases of concentric ankle dorsiflexions.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans optimize muscle activation strategies to minimize energy costs at faster movement velocities. However, empirical evidence on the relationship between joint power and motor unit control strategies is lacking. Therefore, we investigated whether the range of motion and movement velocity influence the association between concentric ankle joint power and motor unit discharge rates in the tibialis anterior muscle. Eleven males performed submaximal concentric ankle dorsiflexion at 5°/s and 20°/s. High-density surface electromyography was recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle and decomposed at the two movement velocities to extract motor unit behavioral data. Ankle power and HD-sEMG from each movement velocity were separated into the first (INI) and second half (END) of the concentric motion. The results showed that the ankle power during INI at 20°/s (3.1 ± 0.7 W/kg) was greater when compared to END at 20°/s (1.8 ± 0.5 W/kg) and to both INI and END at 5°/s (0.5 ± 0.1 W/kg, p < 0.001). The relative increase in discharge rate slope from 5°/s to 20°/s was greater during INI (5.4 ± 1.0 a.u.) when compared to END (2.1 ± 1.0 a.u., p < 0.0001). Moreover, we found significant associations between ankle power and average discharge rate (r = 0.53, p < 0.005) and discharge rate slopes (r=-0.41, p < 0.005) during INI at 20°/s, but not at 5°/s. Our results demonstrate that neural drive modulation in dynamic contractions is determined by the increase in power required to execute movements, demanding specific motor unit control strategies at the start of concentric actions. Moreover, only movements performed at 20°/s demonstrated significant relation between concentric power and motor unit rate coding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.