Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41417053›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2025

Nanomaterials in food safety and environmental monitoring: advances, challenges, and future directions.

Ruohan Zhang, Jiawen Yao, Muhammad Mateen, Abdul Wahab, Yang Xiaosen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruohan ZhangDepartment of Physics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Jiawen YaoDepartment of Physics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Muhammad MateenDepartment of Physics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Abdul WahabBasic Teaching and Research Department, Shenyang Urban Construction University, Shenyang, 110167, China. abdulwahab@mail.ustc.edu.cn.
Yang XiaosenDepartment of Physics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring safety is the central objective in the assessment of food and environmental quality. With continuous advances in analytical technologies, nanomaterials (NMs) have driven a paradigm shift in safety testing owing to their tunable photoelectromagnetic effect, large specific surface area, targeted recognition ability, and biocompatibility. This review summarizes the categories, characteristics, and synthesis methods of zero-, one-, two-, and three-dimensional NMs. Particular emphasis is placed on the detection mechanisms and optimization strategies of NM-based sensors, including surface functionalization, heteroatom doping, and composite material design, in applications such as fluorescence quenching, surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and antibacterial assays. The complementary role of Machine Learning (ML) in predicting NMs properties, optimizing structures, and guiding synthesis is also discussed. Despite their widespread application in food safety and environmental monitoring, challenges such as toxicity and stability remain. Future directions should focus on developing low toxicity, high-performance NMs and fostering interdisciplinary integration to enable more efficient, intelligent detection platforms, ultimately providing a closed-loop solution for food safety from laboratory research to industrial practice.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFood SafetyNanostructuresAnimalsHumansMachine LearningSpectrum Analysis, RamanEnvironmental monitoringFood safetyNanomaterialsNanotechnology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.