SynthesisHNO2026
[Digital examinations in medical education: a systematic overview with practical recommendations].
Synthesis in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digitalization opens up a wide range of didactic and organizational possibilities for examinations in medical curricula. This article provides a systematic overview of the potential, challenges, and current implementation scenarios of digital examinations-from computer-based exams and video-based formats to virtual reality applications. The focus lies on both the didactic opportunities for assessing medical competencies and on the new challenges related to organization, technology, and legal certainty. The article also highlights the dynamic role of artificial intelligence. Its integration creates new possibilities for formative and competence-oriented assessment but also raises questions regarding equal opportunities, fraud prevention, and ethical considerations. The successful implementation of digital examinations requires a clear orientation towards didactic goals, close cooperation among various university stakeholders, and continuous professional development. Overall, it is evident that digital examinations contribute to increased efficiency and improved examination quality, while also requiring ongoing evaluation and continuous improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41417043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.