ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Compensating thickness effects in micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy using integrated optical microscopy for thickness determination of soft matter block copolymer membranes.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A non-invasive method using the integrated optical microscope of a laboratory-based 2-dimensional micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (2D µXRF) instrument to determine the thickness of soft matter samples has been successfully developed, validated, and applied. This easy-to-use method is applicable to soft matrices in a thickness range from 25 to 1000 µm. The main advantage of this method is that thickness determination is directly related to the physical thickness of the sample, rather than its optical thickness, and it does not affect the sample structure, i.e., it does not require any drying or embedding. Elemental composition and distribution analysis by 2D µXRF can be performed on the same sample specimen, using the same setup directly before or after thickness determination. Knowledge of the thickness of different samples can be used to normalize elemental intensities to compensate for the mass-thickness effect, enabling reliable comparison of samples of different thicknesses. By systematically probing several points on a sample surface, this approach can also be used to correct the elemental intensity of unevenly thick soft matter samples. The aspect of correcting element intensities based on the determined thickness should enable direct quantification of element contents using µXRF and external calibration in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.