Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416917›Full record

SynthesisJournal of analytical toxicology2026

Pre-analytical stability of drugs of abuse in urine for confirmatory testing: a systematic review.

Elke Hoffmann-Lücke, Ellen Hollands Steffensen, Mie Samson, Eva Greibe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elke Hoffmann-LückeDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2437-0140
Ellen Hollands SteffensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Mie SamsonDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Eva GreibeDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.

Funding

Department of Clinical -Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (to E.G.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of drugs of abuse in biological fluids requires thorough knowledge of stability of the drugs under various conditions, including sample collection, handling, transportation, and analysis, to ensure accurate interpretation of results. This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the pre-analytical stability of selected clinically relevant drugs of abuse in urine. A systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted in October 2020 and February 2024. The search strategy encompassed over 20 drugs and their relevant metabolites tested in urine, focusing on studies that examined the stability of opioids, amphetamine-like drugs (including ephedrine, cocaine and cathinone), and cannabis using mass spectrometry. A total of 2688 records were identified, and 71 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated storage conditions including room temperature, refrigeration, freezing, and deep freezing, as well as the effects of freeze-thaw cycles. Most drugs demonstrated stability for months when refrigerated or frozen, and deep freezing and freeze-thaw cycles generally had minimal impact on stability. However, storage at room temperature showed limited stability, with cathinone, cannabis, morphine, codeine, and cocaine being particularly prone to degradation under different conditions. This review offers valuable insights into the storage stability of a wide range of drugs of abuse in urine, serving as a practical resource for healthcare professionals and others working with these substances in laboratory settings.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsSubstance Abuse DetectionDrug StabilityFreezingHumansSpecimen HandlingIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID41416917
PMCPMC13132878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.