Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416803›Full record

ReviewmBio2026

Extracellular vesicles: the double-edged sword in viral infections.

Sharda Kumari, Arup Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharda KumariLaboratory of Virology, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Science, Faridabad, India.ORCID 0009-0004-2428-4711
Arup BanerjeeLaboratory of Virology, Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Science, Faridabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-1763

Funding

SERB, DST, India EMR/2017/001490UGC, India DEC18-319539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bound nanocarriers released by various eukaryotic cells and found in diverse bodily fluids. EVs have transitioned from being considered cellular waste disposers to significant players in intercellular communication and signaling. These EVs carry signature cargos of infected cells and thus can be helpful as biomarkers or prognostic markers for infectious diseases. Viruses can manipulate the EV biogenesis machinery in their own dissemination. EVs released from virus-infected cells can carry immune modulatory molecules, thus contributing to disease progression. This comprehensive review collates the information on the impact of EVs on viral infection and disease progression.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesVirus DiseasesAnimalsBiomarkersHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansVirusesBiomarkersdengueEVsextracellular vesiclesHIVimmune modulationnanocarrierspathogenesisSARS-CoV-2vaccinesviral infection

Identifiers

PMID41416803
PMCPMC12892939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.