ArticleBiometrics2025
Censoring-robust estimation in fixed sample time-to-event clinical trials with adaptive randomization.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive randomization is a clinical trial design feature used to modify treatment allocation probabilities during accrual. In time-to-event trials, the impact of adaptive randomization is less well understood for estimating treatment efficacy in the presence of time-varying effects [e.g., relative risk of progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death changes over time]. Here, we focus on time-to-event trials where the scientific estimand is a marginal hazard ratio in the absence of intermittent censoring over the support of observed times. We analytically show that adaptive randomization alters censoring patterns and illustrate via Monte Carlo simulations that the Cox proportional hazards estimator can yield biased estimates. As a remedy, we propose a censoring-robust estimator based on reweighting the partial likelihood score by treatment-specific censoring distributions that account for adaptive randomization. We derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator and evaluate its finite sample operating characteristics via simulation. Finally, we apply our proposed method using data from the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS Trial 002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.