Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416705›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2026

Open RGB imaging workflow for morphological and morphometric analysis of fruits using deep learning: a case study on almonds.

Jorge Mas-Gómez, Manuel Rubio, Federico Dicenta, Pedro José Martínez-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorge Mas-GómezFruit Breeding Group, Department of Plant Breeding, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura-Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus Universitario Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-6743
Manuel RubioFruit Breeding Group, Department of Plant Breeding, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura-Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus Universitario Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4605-8227
Federico DicentaFruit Breeding Group, Department of Plant Breeding, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura-Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus Universitario Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.
Pedro José Martínez-GarcíaFruit Breeding Group, Department of Plant Breeding, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura-Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus Universitario Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7647-5235

Funding

AEI CNS2022-135936AEI PID2021-127421OB-I00European Union FPU20/00614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput phenotyping is addressing the current bottleneck in phenotyping within breeding programs. Imaging tools are becoming the primary resource for improving the efficiency of phenotyping processes and providing large datasets for genomic selection approaches. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) brings new advantages by enhancing phenotyping methods using imaging, making them more accessible to breeding programs. In this context, we have developed an open Python workflow for analyzing morphology, color, and morphometric traits using AI, which can be applied to fruits and other plant organs.

resultsThe workflow was implemented in almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D. A. Webb), a species where breeding efficiency is critical due to its long breeding cycle. Over 25,000 kernels, more than 20,000 nuts, and over 600 individuals were phenotyped, making this the largest morphological study conducted in almond so far. The best segmentation and reconstruction approaches achieved error rates below 1%. Weight and area variables enabled accurate estimation of kernel thickness, with a root mean squared error of 0.47. Fifty-five heritable morphological, morphometric, and color traits were identified, highlighting their potential as target traits in breeding programs.

conclusionThe proposed workflow demonstrated robust performance across diverse datasets and was effective with limited training data for fine-tuning. Its compatibility with the output of AI-based labeling tools allows users to fully leverage the advantages of these technologies-reducing manual effort, accelerating dataset preparation, and streamlining the fine-tuning process of segmentation models. This flexibility enhances the scalability and practical applicability of the workflow in real-world phenotyping scenarios, especially in the context of breeding programs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFruitImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPrunus dulcisPhenotypePlant BreedingWorkflowalmondsbreedingcomputer visiondeep learninghigh-throughput phenotyping

Identifiers

PMID41416705
PMCPMC12970599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.