Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416571›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

A qualitative study on utilization of vulnerability assessment tool for heatwave-related health adaptation intervention in Australia.

Patrick Amoatey, Grace Arnot, Aklilu Endalamaw, Nicholas J Osborne, Zhiwei Xu, Dung Phung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick AmoateySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences (HMBS), The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2995-5399
Grace ArnotInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Geringhap Street, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-6366
Aklilu EndalamawSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences (HMBS), The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
Nicholas J OsborneSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences (HMBS), The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-2284
Zhiwei XuSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia.
Dung PhungSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences (HMBS), The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.

Funding

The University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heatwave-health vulnerability index (HVI) map is an important tool for mitigating heatwave. However, the perspectives of heatwave-health management professionals (HMPs) about heatwave vulnerability have not been examined. This study aims to understand HMP's perception and experiences of applying the HVI tool for heatwave-related health adaptation and mitigation. A semi-structured interview with HMPs was conducted between June and October 2024 across the Australian state agencies. We conducted an online interview, which lasted ∼31 minutes. Participants were asked to share their perspectives about the HVI tool, its policy applications, challenges, and recommendations. Twenty HMPs, the majority (75%) within 40-59 years old, 10 female (50%), and with a median (range) heat-health work experience of 6 (2-11) years participated in the study. The HMPs were from Health (50%), Climate/Environment (15%), Emergency Services (10%), Meteorology (10%), and City Councils (15%). The five themes identified were the following: (i) HMPs have moderate levels of awareness of heatwave vulnerability, particularly in the context of locating the hottest areas, (ii) HVI is considered an important tool for heatwave planning, public information, and urban design, (iii) adherence to traditional heat management strategies, low national awareness, and resourcing problems are perceived as key barriers to a national HVI, (iv) the current HVI is faced with methodological inconsistencies, limited understanding, and low confidence among policymakers, and (v) HMP are well positioned to evaluate HVI and encourage broader engagement of the index in Australia. This study offers critical insight for improving policy awareness and enhances the evaluation of the HVI through a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

Extreme HeatAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAustraliaheatwave vulnerabilityinterview studystate professionalsthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41416571
PMCPMC12715503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.