Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416454›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

Charting the way forward for HTA in Asia-Pacific: HTAsiaLink's strategic plan.

Ryan Jonathan Sitanggang, Lapad Pongcharoenyong, Natcha Kongkam, Wendy Babidge, Auliya Suwantika, Izzuna Mudla Mohamed Ghazali, Ling-Chen Chien, Miyoung Choi, Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak, Sitanshu Kar and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rethinking the role of health technology assessment: from gatekeeper to health system shaper.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ryan Jonathan Sitangganghttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2245-8323
Lapad Pongcharoenyonghttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Natcha Kongkamhttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Wendy BabidgeThe Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical (ASERNIP-S), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Auliya SuwantikaIndonesia Health Technology Assessment Committee (InaHTAC), Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Izzuna Mudla Mohamed GhazaliMalaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-0485
Ling-Chen ChienDivision of Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE), Taipei, Taiwan.
Miyoung ChoiNational Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, South Korea.
Saudamini Vishwanath Dabakhttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6161-6165
Sitanshu KarDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, https://ror.org/02fq2px14Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Takashi FukudaCenter for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Government of Japan Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, Saitama, Japan.
Wanrudee Isaranuwatchaihttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot Teerawattananonhttps://ror.org/02qk1yb72Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program Foundation (HITAP), Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Benjamin Shao Kiat OngAgency for Care Effectiveness (ACE), Government of Singapore Ministry of Health, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0420-9499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) informs resource allocation and policy decisions, particularly to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Recognizing the increasing demand for evidence-informed decision-making, the HTAsiaLink network was established in 2011 as a regional platform to strengthen individual and institutional capacity in HTA research and facilitate the integration of HTA evidence into policy decisions across the Asia-Pacific.Over the years, HTAsiaLink has expanded to over fifty members from twenty economies. In 2024, a structured strategic planning process was undertaken to ensure its continued growth and strengthen its impact on HTA development and implementation. This process involved a targeted review of strategic plans from international networks, alongside comprehensive member engagement, to develop a data-driven and adaptable plan responsive to the evolving healthcare landscape and member needs. As a result, five strategic priorities, corresponding action items, and success indicators were identified.This commentary outlines the needs and processes involved in developing the network's first-ever strategic plan, emphasizing the critical role of member engagement in shaping its future direction. We believe that this experience offers transferable insights for other HTA networks, particularly those operating in low- and middle-income country contexts, on the collaborative development of strategic plans that are responsive to shared objectives, accommodate varying institutional capacities, and align with regional priorities.

Indexed as

Strategic PlanningTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAsiaDecision MakingHealth PolicyHumansPolicy MakingUniversal Health InsuranceAsia-Pacificcapacity buildingevidence-informed decision-makingHealth Technology AssessmentHTAsiaLinknetworkstrategic plan

Identifiers

PMID41416454
PMCPMC12723306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.