Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416407›Full record

ArticleBioelectromagnetics2025

Towards a Planetary Health Impact Assessment Framework: Exploring Expert Knowledge and Artificial Intelligence for a RF-EMF Exposure Case-Study.

Magdalini Stefanopoulou, Tabea S Sonnenschein, Florence Poulletier de Gannes, Simon Scheider, Roel Vermeulen, Martin Röösli, Anke Huss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectromagnetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalini StefanopoulouInstitute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6613-6707
Tabea S SonnenscheinInstitute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Florence Poulletier de GannesLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système (IMS), Université Bordeaux, Talence, France.
Simon ScheiderHuman Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Roel VermeulenInstitute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Martin RöösliDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Anke HussInstitute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon Europe ETAIN project 101057216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While recent WHO systematic reviews have comprehensively assessed the direct health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure, its potential indirect impacts on human health via ecosystem disruption remain unstudied. Therefore, we propose a Planetary Health Impact Assessment (PHIA) approach, which incorporates both direct and ecologically mediated pathways. Developing the underlying framework requires a method for organizing and visualizing complex, interdisciplinary knowledge. This study explores an approach for constructing a PHIA framework in the form of knowledge graphs (KGs). Using RF-EMF exposure from mobile telecommunication technologies as a case study, we developed an expert-based KG in collaboration with 12 specialists. We further evaluated the potential of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool, incorporating Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning, to extract relevant information from scientific literature and generate KGs to explore ways to enhance the expert-based approach. Experts developed and visualized jointly the hypothesized pathways linking RF-EMF exposure to direct health effects on organisms and indirect effects on human health through ecological consequences. The AI tool quickly processed large volumes of literature and visualized it into KGs with varied structures but required extensive expert validation due to limitations in precision and context sensitivity. The expert-based KG can serve as organizer of the available knowledge and as a first step in PHIA development. While AI tools offer potential for exploratory analysis, they currently require substantial human oversight and cannot replace expert judgment. The resulting KGs also identified possible gaps in the scientific literature.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectromagnetic FieldsEnvironmental ExposureHealth Impact AssessmentRadio WavesHumansartificial intelligenceexpert elicitationknowledge graphsmobile telecommunication technologiesplanetary health

Identifiers

PMID41416407
PMCPMC12715659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.