ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
A DNA methylation assay (MPap) using self-collected tampon versus cytology collection swab for endometrial cancer detection.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the practicability of self-collected tampons with the MPap assay for endometrial cancer (EC) detection, by comparing with the results of cervical swabs.
methodsA total of 85 women at Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) were included to directly compare the performance of physician-collected swabs and self-collected tampons. An additional cohort of 39 self-collected tampons from patients at Shuang Ho Hospital (SHH) was included for further validation. The effects of age, body mass index (BMI), and BHLHE22 and CDO1 methylation levels on MPap test performance were analyzed across samples from patients with and without EC. The performance of the MPap test is presented as percentage of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (ACC). The Pearson's correlation test was used to examine the association between swab and tampon in the MPap test.
resultsThe area under the curve (AUC) of MPap to detect EC in 85 swabs and tampons both were 0.94 (0.88-1.00). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ACC of the two collection methods did not show significant differences. The testing results using a tampon were highly correlated with the results using a physician-collected swab (R
conclusionOur data inferred the potential of the MPap test in early detection of EC using vaginal secretion collected by an intravaginal self-collected tampon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.