ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2026
Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing ileostomy closure: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuadratus lumborum (QL) block is used for multimodal analgesia following abdominal surgery. We introduced an ultrasound-guided QL block to treat postoperative pain for ileostomy closure. This study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of the QL block compared to placebo after ileostomy closure.
methodsFifty-seven patients undergoing elective ileostomy closure were randomized (1:1) to the placebo or QL block group in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. After general anesthesia, a unilateral QL block was performed under ultrasound guidance. Opioid consumption and numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain scores were recorded at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was the NRS pain score at rest at 6 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, rescue analgesics over 72 hours, Quality of Recovery-15 scores in 24 hours, complications, and length of hospital stay.
resultsBaseline characteristics were similar among the 54 patients (27 per group) who completed the study, excluding three who dropped out. The QL block did not reduce NRS pain scores at rest at 6 hours (median [interquartile range], 5 [4-6] vs. 5 [3-6]; p=0.78). Over the 72-hour postoperative period, pain scores at rest remained comparable between the groups, while the QL group showed slightly lower movement-induced pain at certain time points. The QL group required fewer analgesics and antiemetics at certain intervals, but the total opioid use, length of hospital stay, and quality of recovery were not significantly different.
conclusionThe QL block showed no meaningful advantage in postoperative analgesia compared to placebo for ileostomy closures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.