Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416332›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Anorectal Pathophysiology in Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.

Sudipta K Roy, Arka Banerjee, Bipul Barman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sudipta K RoyDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial (SSKM) Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Arka BanerjeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial (SSKM) Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Bipul BarmanDepartment of Gastroenterology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER) and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial (SSKM) Hospital, Kolkata, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare, benign rectal disorder characterized by symptoms such as rectal bleeding, constipation, mucus discharge, and incomplete evacuation, often leading to diagnostic delays due to overlap with other colorectal conditions. Functional anorectal abnormalities are thought to contribute significantly to its pathogenesis, yet systematic evaluation remains limited. This study aimed to assess anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) findings in adult SRUS patients and to analyze their association with specific clinical symptoms. Methods This cross-sectional observational study included 24 adult patients with histologically confirmed SRUS from February 2023 to March 2024. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. All patients underwent ARM and BET. Findings were classified using London classification and normative Indian ARM parameters. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and hierarchical clustering on principal components (HCPC) were used to identify symptom-pathophysiology patterns among SRUS patients. Univariable Firth's logistic regression explored associations between demographic variables, clinical features and ARM findings, while multivariable analysis was avoided due to small sample size. Results A total of 24 adult patients were included in the study: 12 (50%) males and 12 (50%) females. The median age was 26 years (range: 18-70). The most common symptoms were rectal bleeding (20; 83%), constipation (17; 71%), and mucus in stool (15; 63%). On ARM, the most frequent abnormalities were rectal hypersensitivity (10; 41.7%) and disorder of rectoanal coordination (9; 37.5%). Balloon expulsion was abnormal in nine (37.5%) patients. Multiple correspondence analysis identified two dimensions explaining 50.1% variance, distinguishing dysfunction severity (Dimension 1) and sensory-pressure phenotypes (Dimension 2). Hierarchical clustering revealed five distinct patient phenotypes: poor propulsion and dyssynergia phenotype (n=6, 25%), dyssynergia-dominant phenotype (n=4, 16.7%), hypersensitivity phenotype (n=7, 29.2%), normal phenotype (n=6, 25%), and isolated hypotension phenotype (n=1, 4.2%). Firth's logistic regression identified significant associations: constipation inversely predicted normal findings (OR=0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.10, p<0.001) and predicted rectal hypersensitivity (OR=21.00, 95% CI: 2.02-2885.43, p=0.007); digital rectal evacuation predicted abnormal expulsion with poor propulsion and dyssynergia (OR=25.00, 95% CI: 2.34-3457.52, p=0.005); disease duration predicted abnormal expulsion with dyssynergia (OR=1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, p=0.005). Conclusion SRUS patients show marked pathophysiological heterogeneity with distinct motor and sensory phenotypes. Constipation and digital evacuation strongly predict anorectal dysfunction. Objective ARM assessment is essential to identify these phenotypes and enable targeted therapies to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

anorectal manometryballoon expulsion testdyssynergic defecationeastern indiafunctional bowel disorderiapwg protocollondon classificationrectal hypersensitivityrectoanal coordinationsolitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41416332
PMCPMC12710981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.