ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Radiological Awareness of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA poisonous, colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas is carbon monoxide (CO). High-level exposure to CO can result in serious illness or death, and CO poisoning is now recognized as a critical public health concern worldwide. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Saudi Arabian physicians' radiological knowledge of CO intoxication.
methodsThis online survey research, which was cross-sectional, assessed doctors' knowledge and awareness of CO poisoning in Saudi Arabia. Licensed physicians were invited to complete an online questionnaire covering demographics and work data, exposure to CO poisoning cases, training history, radiological awareness, and physicians' practice and attitude towards CO poisoning. The questionnaire was validated for clarity, reliability, and relevance and was shared on social media platforms for participation.
resultsAmong 393 eligible physicians, 127 (32.3%) had received training on CO poisoning and its radiological manifestations, while 137 (34.9%) had encountered suspected CO poisoning cases in their clinical practice. Overall, 340 (86.5%) physicians demonstrated poor knowledge and awareness of radiological indicators of CO poisoning, while only 53 (13.5%) exhibited adequate awareness. Higher awareness was significantly associated with greater years of experience (p<0.05).
conclusionsThis study reveals that most physicians in Saudi Arabia lack sufficient knowledge of CO poisoning and its radiological indicators. Although about one-third had relevant exposure and training, the perceived training effectiveness was low. Senior physicians displayed greater awareness, and most respondents acknowledged the importance of identifying radiological signs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.