ReviewCureus2025
The Impact of Probiotics on Acne Vulgaris: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07539129 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Oral Probiotics Versus Placebo in Pakistani Patients With Moderate Acne on Acne Lesion Count and Systemic Inflammation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Oral Probiotics Versus Placebo in Pakistani Patients With Moderate Acne on Acne Lesion Count and Systemic Inflammation (Interleukin-6) Levels
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotic-Mediated Inhibition of Skin Pathogens and Modulation of Innate Immune Responses in HaCaT Cells.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Exposome involvement in the development of acne vulgaris.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a multifactorial inflammatory skin disorder influenced by hormonal activity, microbial imbalance, and immune dysregulation. While conventional treatments such as antibiotics and retinoids remain effective, their long-term use is often limited by side effects, resistance, and poor adherence. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of probiotics as an adjunct or alternative therapy for acne management. Four randomized controlled trials involving 227 participants were analyzed, showing that probiotic supplementation reduced acne severity scores (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.79) and non-inflammatory lesion counts (mean difference (MD) -4.62; 95% CI -8.10 to -1.15) compared with controls. A trend toward improvement in inflammatory lesions was observed (MD -2.03; 95% CI -5.46 to 1.41) but was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity across studies ranged from moderate to high, reflecting variation in probiotic strains, formulations, and treatment durations. While these findings suggest a potential benefit of probiotics, the limited number and quality of trials warrant cautious interpretation. Larger, standardized clinical studies are needed to confirm efficacy and identify optimal probiotic regimens for acne management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.