ArticleCureus2025
A Cross-Sectional Survey Evaluating the Knowledge of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Intraoperative Radiation Safety Precautions.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Intraoperative radiation has provided significant benefits to orthopaedic surgery, improving the accuracy of procedures and patient outcomes. However, the potential risks of ionising radiation cannot be overlooked. Guidelines and regulations such as Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 (IRMER), the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA), and the Radiation in Orthopaedics (RIO) study have established frameworks for minimising exposure while maximising the clinical effectiveness of intraoperative imaging. Ongoing training, technological advancements, and adherence to safety protocols are essential to ensure that the benefits of intraoperative radiation are achieved without compromising patient and clinician health and safety. Methods A 12-item questionnaire was prepared and initially piloted before being distributed to orthopaedic surgeons working within one trust. The survey assessed surgeon knowledge of existing radiation safety training, including trust policies and effects of radiation exposure, and perceptions on developing a training programme targeting intraoperative radiation safety. Results A total of 85 responses were collected, with a response rate of 65.9%, from an eligible sample of 129 orthopaedic surgeons. Of the participants, 44 (51.8%), 27 (31.8%), 10 (11.8%), and 4 (4.7%) were orthopaedic registrars, consultants, core trainees, and associate specialist doctors, respectively. Furthermore, 39 (45.9%) out of 85 surveyed stated they had received formal training in the use of fluoroscopy. Only 45 (52.9%) out of 85 surgeons were aware of radiation safety training in the trust. However, 75 (88.2%) out of 85 surgeons stated Yesto being worried about the effects of radiation on their health, and 83 out of 85 (97.6%) doctors surveyed responded Yes to supporting mandatory training in safe use of radiation in the operating room. Conclusion Despite existing guidance and health concerns regarding radiation exposure, orthopaedic surgeons in this study had gaps in such knowledge, potentially compromising health and safety precautions. A training package may improve knowledge of radiation safety for surgeons and operating room personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.