Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416283›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Emergency Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Global Status, Gaps, and Curriculum Reform Priorities.

Al Mahdin Ornob Miah, Filippo Cainelli, Vikas Acharya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Al Mahdin Ornob MiahHospital Medicine, Barts Health Trust, London, GBR.
Filippo CainelliMedicine and Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, GBR.
Vikas AcharyaENT Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) emergencies, such as airway obstruction, severe epistaxis, and foreign body aspiration, are frequent and potentially life-threatening conditions commonly encountered in clinical practice. Despite their prevalence, emergency training in ENT remains insufficient in undergraduate medical education worldwide. This study explores the current status of ENT emergency education, highlighting key gaps and proposing strategies for curriculum reform. Evidence indicates that medical students often graduate with limited competence in managing acute ENT presentations due to short clinical rotations, lack of simulation-based practice, and minimal assessment of procedural skills. These deficiencies are particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries, where limited resources and inadequate faculty development further hinder learning outcomes. Given that ENT emergencies account for a significant proportion of emergency department visits globally, improving undergraduate preparedness is essential to ensure safe and effective patient care. Integrating simulation-based learning, standardised national curricula, and e-learning platforms can enhance both theoretical understanding and practical competence. Developing competency-based frameworks and faculty training programs will further ensure sustainability and equity in education. This paper emphasises the need for coordinated global efforts to reform ENT emergency teaching, promoting a generation of doctors capable of responding confidently and effectively to critical otolaryngologic emergencies.

Indexed as

competency based educationcurriculum reforment emergenciesotolaryngology educationsimulation-based learningundergraduate medical training

Identifiers

PMID41416283
PMCPMC12709561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.