Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416270›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Term Delivery of a Caesarean Scar Niche Pregnancy.

Maria Siddique Panhwar, Konstantina Trimmi, Tasneem Singhal

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Siddique PanhwarObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Haywards Heath, GBR.
Konstantina TrimmiObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Haywards Heath, GBR.
Tasneem SinghalObstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Haywards Heath, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but increasingly recognised complication of previous caesarean delivery, associated with significant maternal morbidity, including haemorrhage, uterine rupture, and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. This case report describes a mid-30-year-old, gravida 4, para 1 female diagnosed with CSP type 1 at six weeks of gestation following spontaneous conception. Despite extensive counselling regarding the high-risk nature of her condition, she elected to continue the pregnancy. Her antenatal course was complicated by placenta previa and placenta percreta, confirmed by ultrasound and MRI. At 37 + 5 weeks, she underwent caesarean delivery with prophylactic internal iliac artery balloon placement and delivered a healthy male infant. Due to extensive placenta percreta with parametrial invasion, a caesarean hysterectomy was performed, which was complicated by ureteric injury requiring surgical repair. The patient recovered well postoperatively. This case emphasises the diagnostic, counselling, and management challenges associated with CSP, highlighting the importance of early detection, multidisciplinary team involvement, and individualised patient counselling to achieve promising outcomes.

Indexed as

caesarean hysterectomycaesarean scar pregnancyplacenta accreta spectrumplacenta previaureter injury

Identifiers

PMID41416270
PMCPMC12710539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.