ArticleCureus2025
Characteristics of the Washington Group Short Set in Assessing Functional Difficulty Among People With Physical Disability Certificates of Vision, Hearing, and Lower-Limb Impairments in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS), consisting of six questions on functional difficulties, is an international disability measure aiming to estimate disability prevalence and disability-related inequalities globally. In 2022, the WG-SS was introduced for the first time in Japan, necessitating a better understanding of the characteristics of the new measure compared with an existing classic disability indicator in Japan, i.e., possession of a physical disability certificate (PDC). Considering that the PDC is issued for individuals with mild to severe impairment, individuals with mild impairment might disproportionately be uncaptured by the WG-SS. For verifying this hypothesis, this study aimed to (1) examine the relationship between the severity of impairment and WG-SS judgment, and (2) describe percentages of individuals captured as "not having disability" based on the WG-SS stratified by severity of impairment among individuals who had the PDC of vision, hearing, or lower-limb impairments.
methodsSecondary dataset of a representative Japanese individuals with disability (n = 14,079) was used for this cross-sectional study. From the dataset, data of individuals who had PDC of vision, hearing, or lower-limb impairments were extracted for analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted distinctively by the impairment group. After examining the relationship between severity of impairments and WG-SS judgement using univariate and multivariate analysis, percentages of individuals captured as "not having disability" based on a recommended cut point of the WG-SS, a response of "a lot of difficulty" or "cannot do at all" on at least one of the six questions, were calculated and described stratified by severity of impairment.
resultsThe number of eligible study participants for analysis was as follows: PDC holders for vision impairment (n = 189), hearing impairment (n = 240), and lower-limb impairment (n = 634). The univariate or multivariate analysis showed significant relationships between the severity of impairment (mild impairment) and the difficulty category of corresponding WG-SS individual questions (mild difficulty, i.e., "no difficulty" or "some difficulty") for each group. Among the PDC holders of vision impairments, the percentages of individuals captured as "not having disability" based on the WG-SS were 16.7% and 5.9% in the mild (n = 36) and severe (n = 153) impairment subgroups, respectively. Similarly, 39.0% and 20.2% in the mild (n = 146) and severe (n = 94) hearing impairment subgroups, respectively, and 54.0% and 28.9% in the mild (n = 430) and severe (n = 204) lower-limb impairment subgroups, respectively.
conclusionPDC holders with mild impairment were less likely to be captured by the WG-SS as "having disability" than those with severe impairment. These findings suggested a characteristic of the WG-SS that the disability statistics based on the WG-SS may underrepresent PDC holders with mild impairment. Stakeholders in Japan need to take into account this characteristic when they use or interpret the WG-SS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.