ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2025
Estimating the valence and arousal of dyadic conversations using autonomic nervous system responses and regression algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous bidirectional coupling of heart rate variability and emotions in dyad speaker-listener dynamics reveals unique interpersonal synchronization.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Automated classification of conversation valence and arousal using autonomic nervous system responses.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autonomic nervous system responses provide valuable information about interactions between pairs or groups of people but have primarily been studied using group-level statistical analysis, with a few studies attempting single-trial classification. As an alternative to classification, our study uses regression algorithms to estimate the valence and arousal of specific conversation intervals from dyads' autonomic nervous system responses. Methods: Forty-one dyads took part in 20-minute conversations following several different prompts. The conversations were divided into ten 2-minute intervals, with participants self-reporting perceived conversation valence and arousal after each 2-minute interval. Observers watched videos of the conversations and separately also rated valence and arousal. Four autonomic nervous system responses (electrocardiogram, electrodermal activity, respiration, skin temperature) were recorded, and both individual and synchrony features were extracted for each 2-minute interval. These extracted features were used with feature selection and a multilinear perceptron to estimate self-reported and observer-reported valence and arousal of each interval in both a dyad-specific (based on data from same dyad) and dyad-nonspecific (based on data from other dyads) manner. Results: Both dyad-specific and dyad-nonspecific regression using the multilinear perceptron resulted in lower root-mean-square errors than a simple median-based estimator and two other regression methods (linear regression and support vector machines). Discussion: The results suggest that physiological measurements can be used to characterize dyadic conversations on the level of individual dyads and conversation intervals. In the long term, such regression algorithms could potentially be used in applications such as education and mental health counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.