Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416249›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Transcranial direct current stimulation over the frontal eye field has no effect on visual search performance.

Charline Peylo, Constanze Albrecht, Ruth Gerlinde Homann, Joshua Richter, Marie Anaïs Dornier, Mona Sophie Ehrat, Finia Luca Loeb, Sophia Manz, Marina Praguer Gaeta, Christina Rieger and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charline PeyloNeuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-9149
Constanze AlbrechtBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Ruth Gerlinde HomannBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Joshua RichterBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Marie Anaïs DornierBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Mona Sophie EhratBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Finia Luca LoebBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Sophia ManzBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Marina Praguer GaetaBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Christina RiegerBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Julia Christine TafelmaierBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany.
Paul SausengNeuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Top-down attention (i.e. the goal-directed (de-)prioritization of information) is fundamental for successful everyday life. Attention deficits caused by brain lesions, like visuospatial neglect or extinction, are therefore of major importance and call for effective therapies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive, electric brain stimulation technique, has been discussed as a potential therapeutic tool. Recent research suggests that anodal tDCS over the frontal eye field (FEF) might increase visual search performance even in healthy participants, substantiating the potential therapeutic efficacy of tDCS (e.g. for stroke rehabilitation). In two pre-registered experiments, we investigated the robustness of these findings. In the first experiment, the right FEF was anodally stimulated, supposedly increasing neural activity; in the second experiment, anodal tDCS was delivered over the left FEF, and the size of the visual search field was manipulated. In neither of the two experiments, previous findings of enhanced visual search performance due to tDCS could be reproduced. In contrast, Bayesian statistics indicated evidence against reliable top-down attention-guided visual search improvements through FEF tDCS in healthy participants. Although effects might be stronger in patient populations, the present results do not suggest tDCS over FEF to be a very strong candidate as a therapeutical approach in attention disorders.

Indexed as

frontal eye fieldtop-down attentiontranscranial direct current stimulationvisual searchvisual-spatial attention

Identifiers

PMID41416249
PMCPMC12709282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.