ArticleBrain communications2025
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the frontal eye field has no effect on visual search performance.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Top-down attention (i.e. the goal-directed (de-)prioritization of information) is fundamental for successful everyday life. Attention deficits caused by brain lesions, like visuospatial neglect or extinction, are therefore of major importance and call for effective therapies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive, electric brain stimulation technique, has been discussed as a potential therapeutic tool. Recent research suggests that anodal tDCS over the frontal eye field (FEF) might increase visual search performance even in healthy participants, substantiating the potential therapeutic efficacy of tDCS (e.g. for stroke rehabilitation). In two pre-registered experiments, we investigated the robustness of these findings. In the first experiment, the right FEF was anodally stimulated, supposedly increasing neural activity; in the second experiment, anodal tDCS was delivered over the left FEF, and the size of the visual search field was manipulated. In neither of the two experiments, previous findings of enhanced visual search performance due to tDCS could be reproduced. In contrast, Bayesian statistics indicated evidence against reliable top-down attention-guided visual search improvements through FEF tDCS in healthy participants. Although effects might be stronger in patient populations, the present results do not suggest tDCS over FEF to be a very strong candidate as a therapeutical approach in attention disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.