ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
The first causal inference analysis of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register shows a positive effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on knee prosthesis survival.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The first causal inference analysis of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register shows a positive effect of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on knee prosthesis survival.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The survival of a knee prosthesis is one of the most important indicators of the success or failure of a knee arthroplasty. An intervention that could increase prosthetic survival is the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) during primary surgery, but the evidence for this is not conclusive. The question of whether such an intervention increases prosthetic survival is a causal one, and yet it has never been addressed with causal methods in the observational studies literature. This constitutes a serious limitation, as there is growing evidence that the best-suited framework for addressing causal questions with observational data is causal inference. Methods: In the present study, causal inference methods were employed to answer the research question of whether ALBC increases prosthetic survival. In particular, directed acyclic graphs were used for identification and causal survival forests were used to estimate the effect of interest. The rationale behind these methods is provided in the main text, and technical details are provided in Supporting Information: File S3. Data from the Catalan Arthroplasty Register were analysed. Results: ALBC had an effect of increasing the overall prosthetic survival by 8% after 120 months of follow-up. The intervention had a positive effect across all the subgroups of the population defined by confounding variables, but the effect was greater in men, young patients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis or obesity, and patients who smoked or abused alcohol. The chosen causal assumptions had an impact on the obtained results, empirically showing the importance of using a causal framework. Conclusions: ALBC increased knee prosthesis survival among patients in the Catalan public healthcare system. Causal inference methods are the most appropriate for answering causal questions about the effect of ALBC on prosthetic survival when the analysed data are observational. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.