Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416216›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Separating feedforward and feedback dynamics using time-frequency resolved connectivity: A hybrid model of left ventral occipitotemporal cortex in word reading.

Jiaxin You, Olaf Hauk, Riitta Salmelin, Marijn van Vliet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaxin YouDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-3288
Olaf HaukMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Riitta SalmelinDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Marijn van VlietDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT) is crucial in reading. Its functional role is viewed either as a prelexical feedforward hub or as a bidirectional interface between sensory and higher-order linguistic systems. To consolidate the two views and comprehensively explain the functional complexity of left vOT, we investigated the temporal and spectral dynamics of information flows involving left vOT during visual word and pseudoword reading using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and two directed connectivity metrics, that is, phase slope index (PSI) and Granger causality (GC). Specifically, feedforward connectivity from low-level visual areas to vOT was observed for all conditions, with the strength of orthographic information flow to left superior temporal cortex (ST) modulated by stimulus word-likeness. Conversely, feedback flow from left ST to vOT appeared for pseudowords that allow top-down linguistic constraints to facilitate reading, and occurred later for word-like than complete pseudowords. Our findings suggest that left vOT during word reading functions in a hybrid manner: operating in efficient feedforward mode for familiar word recognition while flexibly recruiting bidirectional processing for unfamiliar pseudowords. By disentangling feedforward and feedback dynamics with high temporal and spectral resolution, we empirically reconcile different theories of vOT function.

Indexed as

directed connectivityleft ventral occipitotemporal cortexMEGtime–frequency resolutionword reading

Identifiers

PMID41416216
PMCPMC12709547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.