Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416215›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Unraveling the neural basis of repeated moral decisions with mouse tracking and fMRI.

Xinyi Julia Xu, Guochun Yang, Jiamin Huang, Ruien Wang, Haiyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinyi Julia XuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-3798
Guochun YangGuangdong Institute of Intelligence Science and Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-8772
Jiamin HuangCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Ruien WangCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-4266
Haiyan WuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-6636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking response history and current rewards is critical for making moral decisions. By integrating functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and mouse tracking (MT) with a value-based moral decision task, we quantify the level of choice conflict with the MT metric-area under the curve (AUC), and examine how individuals incorporate information from the response history to make repeated moral decisions. Our study uses response entropy and cumulative responses (CR) to define choice consistency on both the subject level and trial level. We find that a stronger correlation between AUC and response entropy is mediated by the weight of reward in decisions. Regarding the fMRI results, the precuneus tracks AUC and increases across time. Across the whole brain, we compare the pattern of how the human brain encodes AUC with several NeuroSynth templates, and find that neural similarity of reward decreased and was correlated with entropy and the weight of relative reward. Meanwhile, multivariate representations in cognitive control and self-referential brain regions such as inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) encode the weight of relative reward and CR together. Finally, the functional connectivity (FC) analysis show that ACC, as well as the FC between ACC and precuneus, becomes more prominent across time. Through understanding choice conflict and response history, our research sheds light on its significance in multi-trial moral decision from the consistency perspective. These findings establish a foundation for exploring the underlying mechanisms involved in repeated decisions with conflict processes.

Indexed as

choice consistencydishonestyfMRImoral decisionsmouse trackingreward

Identifiers

PMID41416215
PMCPMC12709548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.